If this was my Alderman, I would run against him. What a racist, facist jerk. An art mural on PRIVATE PROPERTY was removed by city graffiti workers because police didn't like it. The police told the alderman and Ald. Balcer decided that there might be hidden gang signs in the mural and that he just wanted it removed. This is why Alderman shouldn't be judging art.
Alderman says he had this mural destroyed
apps.wbez.org - 27 weeks ago - 2784 views
11 Comments Have your say. Vote up the best responses. ↓
Reactions on the web
Latest tweets linking to this story (Share url: http://windycitizen.com/wcoO)
Latest tweets linking to this story (Share url: http://windycitizen.com/wcoO)

Message me







Top Arts Stories This Week



5
Comments
If you read through to the WBEZ article, Streets and Sanitation isn't even sure anymore that what they did was legal, because Buildings says that no permit was needed for the mural.
The alderman is an authoritarian thug, and shameless about it.
As a matter of private property rights the city was in the wrong.
As a matter of bureaucratic procedure removal of the mural was wrong.
And as a matter of the majority dictating culture and taste to the minority, removal of the mural was wrong.
What is this ad hominem attack based on?
Interesting, but where are you getting this argument from?
Is there a correct procedure for stuff like this?
Aren't the majority behind keeping the mural and it was just a few powerful folks who got rid of it?
Also, why the heck is this old story creeping up the front page. Weird.
I thought the majority were for this mural too. But I'm even more perplexed about how this story resurfaced. Any of the new voters want to say how they found this story?
Someone with a lot of StumbleUpon mojo stumbled the story, helping to push it back up the charts.
Thanks for clarifying. Wondered what happened. Just a matter of time till we'll see the WGN reporter playing basketball again.
The mural was on private property.
I assume you wouldn't be OK with an alderman calling the graffiti blasters to sandblast your house because he didn't like the color of the paint?
Touche! I would not. I see your point now.
The reason for why the mural was painted over from the WBEZ article:
Insane...destroying art..
Didn't the Taliban destroy the reclining Buddha statues because they offended some cops, er, Muslims?
Post new comment