Get a free account to post and vote Log in
Popular Latest Leaders Submit New+
Post on Facebook: Facebook it
Share this on Twitter: Tweet this story   Ask for votes!
Short link: http://windycitizen.com/wfB7

Why Oprah turned her back on Chicago media

6
blogs.vocalo.org - 25 views    bury it

Robert Feder charts how Oprah's relationship with Chicago media has changed over the past 25 years.

Sign Up or Sign In to vote for this story or Read more »

4 comments ↓ What's your take? Post a comment below:

Comments

BradFlora 11 weeks 1 day ago
+
2
Clout

Of course, it all makes perfect sense: Why would one of the richest, most powerful women alive — with a top-rated talk show, a successful magazine, a thriving production company, a flourishing Internet enterprise, a growing satellite radio venture and her very own cable network — deign to bother dealing with media people she neither trusts nor controls?

There's another question implicit in the paragraph that Feder might have been steering clear of:

"Why would someone this rich and influential live in Chicago?"

Of all the angles regarding Oprah's big announcement, I'm most interested in how this will affect tourism and the city's reputation. An announcement like this, so soon after the Olympic debacle, has to hit doubly hard over at city hall.

josh 11 weeks 1 day ago
+
1
Clout

What does Oprah owe anyone in Chicago, media or otherwise? She's built an incredibly successful business around providing a product that people wanted and enjoyed using. Let her run back to California to count her billions.

Well, if the point is to focus on running a cable network, then she needs to physically be in the place where the majority of talent for that industry is: California. Like it or not, Illinois/Chicago isn't a hotbed of the TV industry, especially not if you're trying to maximize your public exposure to entertainment media.

Some people are claiming that Oprah leaving Chicago has to do with taxes, but that's completely insane. Illinois has a flat personal income tax rate of 3 percent. California has a "progressive" income tax that uses brackets (like the Federal system) that goes up to 9.3 percent at the top bracket. Also, California's cost of living is higher. In general, she's probably losing money if she moves out there, but I'm willing to bet that she's banking on the Oprah Winfrey Network taking off like a rocket.

I think it's mostly about the fact she's moving beyond becoming a personal brand to becoming an enterprise. Building a cable network takes more than what Chicago could realistically provide for Oprah. I makes sense for her to move to the coast rather than try to get people to come here.

I've always thought this about Chicago. We always seem to come behind NYC and LA in the media and entertainment industry. If you want to succeed in those industries, you pick up and head out of the Windy City, which is like a stepping stone.

E 11 weeks 23 hours ago
+
1
Clout

"Why would someone this rich and influential live in Chicago?"

Kickbacks, er, I mean, tax subsidies?

Connect, Sign Up or Log In to discuss this story.
By andrewgill 11 weeks ago
  • 5 following
  • 7followers
  • 613 clout

Chicagoans who voted up this post

  • andrewgill
  • erlanger
  • chicagoan
  • BradFlora
  • TheCitizen
  • josh
  • kiyoshimartinez
  • mobilevulgus

More from andrewgill


© Windy Citizen About Blog Tools Content Policy Terms of Service Privacy Contact Us RSS/Subscribe Advertise